Acer Swift 3 Intel vs. AMD: Which should you buy?
We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.
CPUs brand all the differenceAcer Swift 3 Intel vs. AMD: Which should yous buy?
Powered by Intel
Acer Swift 3 (SF313-52)
Powered by AMD
Acer Swift iii (SF314-42)
The Intel version of the Swift three comes with a far better brandish with 3:2 aspect ratio, great color, and boosted resolution. 10th Gen Intel CPU performance won't measure upwards to AMD Ryzen 4000 CPUs, but the tradeoff is display and features.
$800 at Amazon
Pros
- 2K display with 3:two aspect ratio
- Fantabulous battery life and Instant On
- Light, sturdy build
- Thunderbolt 3 and Wi-Fi 6
- Enormous Precision touchpad
Cons
- Glossy display despite no touch function
- Intel performance lacks compared to Ryzen
- More expensive
The AMD version of the Swift 3 delivers stronger operation thank you to Ryzen 4000 CPUs, but the 16:9 display is dim and offers poor color reproduction. If you're in information technology for raw power, this is the right choice.
$680 at Amazon
Pros
- AMD Ryzen brings performance
- All-solar day battery life
- Cheaper price
- Decent port pick
Cons
- No Thunderbolt 3
- Dim xvi:9 brandish with poor color
Acer Swift 3 Intel vs. AMD tech specs
Despite sharing the aforementioned name, these 2 laptops differ in hardware, features, and dimensions. Here are the specs available in each model.
| Acer Swift three (Intel) | Acer Swift 3 (AMD) | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | tenth Gen Intel Core i5-1035G4 Core i7-1065G7 | AMD Ryzen 5 4500U Ryzen 7 4700U |
| RAM | 8GB, 16GB LPDDR4x | 8GB, 16GB LPDDR4x |
| Graphics | Intel Iris Plus | Radeon Vega 6 Radeon Vega 7 |
| Storage | 512GB, 1TB M.ii PCIe SSD | 256GB, 512GB, 1TB M.2 PCIe SSD |
| Display | 13.five inches 2256x1504 3:2 attribute ratio Non-touch, glossy IPS | 14 inches 1920x1080 16:nine attribute ratio Non-impact, matte IPS |
| Ports | Thunderbolt 3 USB-A 2.0 USB-A 3.1 (Gen 1) HDMI 3.5mm audio | USB-C three.2 (Gen 2) HDMI USB-A ii.0 USB-A 3.0 iii.5mm audio |
| Audio | Dual Stereo speakers Downward-firing | Dual Stereo speakers Down-firing |
| Wireless | Intel Wi-Fi 6 802.11ax Bluetooth five.0 | Intel Wi-Fi 6 802.11ax Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Camera | Front-facing 720p | Forepart-facing 720p |
| Security | Fingerprint reader Kensington lock slot | Fingerprint reader Kensington lock slot |
| Battery | 56Wh | 50Wh |
| Dimensions | 11.ix x 9.ii x 0.63 inches (302.25mm x 233.68mm x 16mm) | 12.7 ten 8.6 x 0.71 inches (322.6mm x 218.4mm x 18mm) |
| Weight | 2.05 pounds (i.2kg) | two.65 pounds (1.2kg) |
Acer Swift 3 Intel vs. AMD blueprint and features
Source: Windows Central
Both of these laptops have a magnesium alloy chassis that provides rigidity while remaining light. The silver finish helps reduce fingerprints and smudges, and so there's not really any issue with a gross laptop opening up in an office or buffet. The AMD version weighs about a one-half-pound more than than the Intel version, no doubt since the latter is thinner at 0.63 inches (16mm) compared to 0.71 inches (18mm). The footprint of these laptops is as well unlike due to the boxier display on the Intel model. The AMD version is wider and not as deep.
Port choice is decent on both models, though the Intel model includes Thunderbolt three instead of regular USB-C. Both have HDMI, multiple USB-A, and iii.5mm audio, and both have Kensington lock slots for some added security. On the palm balance on the two laptops is a fingerprint reader for Windows Hello.
Source: Windows Key Intel version's Thunderbolt 3 port.
The keyboard is similar on both laptops. Silverish keys with a backlight assist with working in the dark and both have good travel that makes for a comfy typing experience. Some might dislike the smaller chiclet keys, but in one case typing regularly, it only takes a few hours to get used to. As for the touchpad, both are using Precision drivers for the best possible pointing. However, the Intel Swift 3's touchpad is much larger, thanks to the deeper chassis. The AMD model's touchpad isn't necessarily small; it's just undersized compared to its sibling.
Both laptops have boilerplate down-firing speakers, and both take an average 720p front-facing webcam. Zippo out of the ordinary hither, but don't expect premium audio or picture show from budget devices. Too included with both laptops is Wi-Fi 6 for fast, reliable wireless internet.
Acer Swift 3 Intel vs. AMD brandish
Source: Windows Central
1 of the most significant downsides of the AMD Swift 3 is its brandish. In our testing, it managed only 61% sRGB, 45% AdobeRGB, and 45% DCI-P3 color reproduction, and it hit but 231 nits brightness at maximum. At to the lowest degree it has a matte finish to aid counteract glare, just information technology'southward still going to struggle in a well-lit space. In that location'south also the xvi:9 aspect ratio, which looks outdated, especially compared to the Intel version's 3:2 aspect ratio. It doesn't wait bad for daily utilize thank you to good contrast, but information technology but doesn't compare overall.
On the other paw, one of the Intel Swift three's all-time features is its brandish. The 3:2 aspect ratio allows for more screen infinite (83.65% screen-to-body ratio), and it also has a college resolution. Instead of 1920x1080, it's additional to 2256x1504, what Acer is calling 2K. It looks fantastic, especially thank you to 100% sRGB, 78% AdobeRGB, and 81% DCI-P3 color reproduction. It does accept a glossy finish despite no touch role, just brightness upwards to 458 nits helps combat glare.
If y'all're interested in some photo editing or just can't stand a dim brandish with poor color, the Intel-based Swift 3 should be heavily favored.
Acer Swift 3 Intel vs. AMD performance, and battery
Source: Windows Central AMD version's internals.
The Intel-based Swift iii is role of Intel's Projection Athena, meaning sure measures have been taken to ensure long bombardment life, overall snappy operation, and Instant On. Indeed, the laptop performs well in everyday tasks, and you're greeted with the Windows 10 login screen before you can finish opening the lid. Bombardment life (56Wh) regularly hit between eight and x hours depending on the task at hand, with a rating of 12 hours and 12 minutes in PCMark 10'south Modern Office rundown test.
The AMD version hit just more than x hours in the same rundown test with its 50Wh battery. It'south not function of Project Athena, but it even so delivered strong raw performance thanks to the AMD Ryzen CPU. If you want stellar functioning from your CPU and integrated GPU — Radeon Vega graphics hands outpace Intel Iris Plus — you should lean toward the AMD version. Y'all can see the differences in some synthetic benchmarks.
Geekbench v
Geekbench five.0 (CPU) (Higher is better)
| Device | CPU | Single core | Multi core |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acer Swift 3 (Intel) | i7-1065G7 | 1,302 | 3,891 |
| Acer Swift 3 (AMD) | Ryzen 7 4700U | 1,131 | 4,860 |
PCMark
PCMark x
| Device | Score |
|---|---|
| Acer Swift 3 (Intel) | 4,135 |
| Acer Swift 3 (AMD) | 4,861 |
Cinebench
Cinebench (R20) (Higher is ameliorate)
| Device | CPU | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Acer Swift 3 (Intel) | Cadre i7-1065G7 | i,229 to one,236 |
| Acer Swift 3 (AMD) | Ryzen 7 4700U | two,391 to ii,428 |
SSD
CrystalDiskMark (Higher is meliorate)
| Device | Read | Write |
|---|---|---|
| Acer Swift 3 (Intel) | 1,641.39 MB/s | i,033.82 MB/s |
| Acer Swift three (AMD) | 2,161.99 MB/south | one,214.84 MB/s |
.
Overall the Intel version is going to offer better battery life and the perks of Projection Athena, merely the AMD version delivers better overall performance, fifty-fifty in the SSD department. Be sure to check out our drove of the best Windows laptops to see other superlative-performing devices available at present.
Go with the Intel-based Swift 3 for better display and features
The Swift 3 with tenth Gen Intel Core CPUs won't evangelize the aforementioned performance (processing or GPU) as Ryzen chips, but information technology does have a far improve display with iii:ii aspect ratio and additional resolution. Information technology also brings better bombardment life, Instant On, and Thunderbolt 3 to the equation. Simply make sure you lot don't paying more than in most cases.
Powered By Intel
Acer Swift iii (SF313-52)
Trade some performance for display and features
The Intel version of the Swift 3 doesn't match the AMD version'southward performance, but it does add a much nicer display with three:2 attribute ratio, meliorate battery life, and a Thunderbolt 3 port.
Stick with the AMD-based Swift 3 for improve performance
The display is seriously defective, there's no Thunderbolt 3, and battery life doesn't quite measure out upwardly (though you lot're even so getting viii to x hours from a charge), merely the performance from the Ryzen CPUs easily outmatch those from Intel. If you lot value CPU and GPU, this should be your beginning selection. Yous tin can too get the AMD version for quite a fleck cheaper.
Powered Past AMD
Acer Swift 3 (SF314-42)
A lot of laptop for the asking toll
If you value performance and bombardment life over display quality, the Acer Swift iii should be a great laptop. Merely watch out for that display.
We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.
Source: https://www.windowscentral.com/swift-3-intel-amd
Posted by: privetthaveracter.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Acer Swift 3 Intel vs. AMD: Which should you buy?"
Post a Comment